![Linkhill Pty Ltd v The Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCATrans 340 (11 December 2015)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Linkhill Pty Ltd v The Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCATrans 340 (11 December 2015)
CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Breaches of load dimensional requirements by consignor and loader.
![Meeuwissen v Meeuwissen [2015] VSC 669 (27 November 2015)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Meeuwissen v Meeuwissen [2015] VSC 669 (27 November 2015)
CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Breaches of load dimensional requirements by consignor and loader.
![Nolan v Sims Group Australia Holdings Limited; Nolan v Delta Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 1424 (6 October 2015)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Nolan v Sims Group Australia Holdings Limited; Nolan v Delta Pty Limited [2015] NSWSC 1424 (6 October 2015)
CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Breaches of load dimensional requirements by consignor and loader.
![Linkhill Pty Ltd v Director, Office of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] FCAFC 99 (22 July 2015)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Linkhill Pty Ltd v Director, Office of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] FCAFC 99 (22 July 2015)
APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – leave to argue ground of appeal not raised before primary judge – permission to raise argument not advanced at trial – when may new argument be advanced on appeal – expedient in interests of justice to allow new argument – failure to raise argument at trial
![Warriner v Warriner [2015] VSC 314 (1 July 2015)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Warriner v Warriner [2015] VSC 314 (1 July 2015)
TESTATOR’S FAMILY MAINTENANCE – Application by adult able-bodied son – Jurisdictional requirements of Part IV of Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), s 91 – Whether testator had responsibility to provide for claimant’s proper maintenance and support – Failure to make adequate provision.
![Gibbs v Haoma Mining NL [No 3] [2015] WADC 57](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Gibbs v Haoma Mining NL [No 3] [2015] WADC 57
Tort - Personal injury - Application by plaintiff for judge to review calculation of general damages.

![MHM Metals Ltd v Rogers [2014] FCA 1006 (18 September 2014)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
MHM Metals Ltd v Rogers [2014] FCA 1006 (18 September 2014)
CORPORATIONS – director’s duties – misappropriation of company funds by a director
![Appeal against this decision dismissed by Middleton, Gilmour and Gleeson JJ on 25 May, 2015 in Rogers v MHM Metals Ltd [2015] FCAFC 67 (25 May 2015)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
![O’Loughlin v Arnott & Anor [2014] VSC 416 (3 September 2014)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
O’Loughlin v Arnott & Anor [2014] VSC 416 (3 September 2014)
Claim by plaintiff under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 – Plaintiff’s solicitor drew prior will of deceased – Possible misuse of confidential information – Solicitor-client privilege – Duty of loyalty – Restraining solicitor as officer of the court from acting for the plaintiff.
![Subway Systems v Ireland [2014] VSCA 142 (1 July 2014)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
![Freestyle Building v Calco Timbers (Costs Decision) (Civil) [2014] VMC 7 (19 March 2014)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Freestyle Building v Calco Timbers (Costs Decision) (Civil) [2014] VMC 7 (19 March 2014)
Costs – plaintiff’s proceeding dismissed – application by the defendant for indemnity costs or uplift to next applicable scale – offer of compromise made by the defendant and rejected by the plaintiff – consideration of principles applicable – application refused.
![Essendon Apartment Developments Pty Ltd v Shaw & Ors [2014] VSC 74 (6 March 2014)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
![Freestyle Building v Calco Timbers (Civil) [2014] VMC 3 (21 February 2014)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Freestyle Building v Calco Timbers (Civil) [2014] VMC 3 (21 February 2014)
Catchwords: Provision of quotation for supply of timber and timber related product for use by plaintiff in tender process – whether price comprised a representation in trade or commerce under s 18 of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
![Subway Systems Australia v Ireland (No.2) [2013] VSC 693](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Subway Systems Australia v Ireland (No.2) [2013] VSC 693
Whether costs of mediation are “costs in the proceeding” – whether mediation by consent relevant – the role of mediation in a proceeding – overarching obligations of parties
![Subway Systems Australia v Ireland [2013] VSC 550 (18 October 2013)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
![Astra Resources PLC v Full Exposure Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 450 (8 May 2013)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
![Mahon v Mach 1 Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 10 (25 January 2013)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Mahon v Mach 1 Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 10 (25 January 2013)
TORT - injurious falsehood - where no actual damage alleged due to early grant of injunction to restrain publication - whether pleading discloses any commercial or proprietary interest of the plaintiff to be protected by the relief sought - whether claim in substance one for defamation rather than injurious falsehood.
![Morrison & Ors v 180 Capital Finance Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] VCC 1744 (9 November 2012)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Morrison & Ors v 180 Capital Finance Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] VCC 1744 (9 November 2012)
CONTRACT- guarantee and indemnity - judgement debt - interest on judgment - costs –contractual provision for indemnity costs - discretionary considerations - interest on costs – Calderbank offer –whether unreasonable refusal.
![Astra Resources Plc v Full Exposure Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1061 (3 October 2012)](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6505742f7cfcf730cfba6400/1696824058094-OP1HZ84JT53WNXQIIMRD/image-asset.jpeg)
Astra Resources Plc v Full Exposure Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1061 (3 October 2012)
Application for interlocutory injunction – where applicant claims respondent published statements on its website that are misleading and deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive in contravention of s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law.